Following On…

…from the last post…

If you might have missed the point there, the world we live in is ruled by entities that exist primarily in a dimension not perceived with our natural senses. (Though this is planned to change dramatically any time now, possibly over the course of the next year or two). The elites who know this and are in league with them (actually “worshipping” them) are “the powers that be”. And these “people” (if you can call them that) have been following a provided agenda by their lord and master for generations, over millennia. This is what is wrong with the world, why it is the way it is!

So, what do we do about it if we don’t like it and want a change, to get out from under this state of slavery, oppression, terror, annihilation and genocide (“you ain’t seen nothin’ yet folks!”)?

Answer? — You have to opt out!

There are many ways to physically try and establish your own personal freedom and security, but these things can only delay the inevitable planned for the world’s peoples. If it can be pulled off on a massive scale, it would take a global stand of six billion or so people basically telling the elites that we are not playing their game anymore and to “get lost, we don’t need you”, and their house of cards would collapse in a day!

However, this is unlikely to happen isn’t it. The primary reason for this is – how do you unite so many people in a common cause, across continents, races, creeds, cultures, histories, etc? Well, this is what the New World Order is all about, but it is an order dictated by the wrong crowd and for the wrong reasons, leading us all to death and destruction! The real reign of peace on earth and good will toward all men will happen. It is written. But it comes later, after “the son of perdition” has been defeated!

Who defeats him? Well, read on…

What did Satan offer Jesus? “All the kingdoms of the world”, because (in this life) they were his and he could do this. This is why the elites are “right up there”, because they have accepted the offer that Jesus rejected!

Why did Jesus reject the offer? Because, as he told one ruler “My Kingdom is not of this world. If My Kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight”. (When one of his disciples, Peter, actually tried it once he was restrained by The Lord, who then healed the soldier whom Peter had wounded). Following this He, literally, laid down His life, for us all! He had said again before this that He would only have to but lift his little finger and legions of angels would be at His side immediately to save Him. But He didn’t! I could get into all “the ins and outs” of all this, but I won’t here. I’ll get to that punch-line in minute.

The main point to understand is the reason why He said His Kingdom was not of this world (in its present state). It is because it is yet to come! And the simple reason it can’t be here yet is because it cannot co-exist with evil, and evil is what is running the world right now! The world has to be cleaned up first! (Forget trying to “preserve the environment”. This is not the only thing needed to be cleaned. First you have to get rid of “those that destroy the earth”, and this is going to happen, executed by The Prince of Peace Himself, have no fear!)

He gave a promise to “the poor”, saying that we would always have these with us. Why? Because there are so many “poor”! Most are being made poor, by the elites, and their plan is to wipe them out in every way they can (because they are a threat, by sheer weight of numbers)! The poor are the ones who also have most of the children (the real “riches”) aren’t they? Another subject.

He also promised that “the meek shall inherit the earth”! Have you noticed how it is mostly the “poor” who are the “meek”? So, what has always been stolen from the peoples of the world by the Satanists will be returned to the poor and the meek, soon!

“But what about those who have already died, or won’t live through what is happening, and the worst that is to come?”

Simple! – Dying is not “the end”! It is only a step across a threshold to eternity, where our souls and spirits came from, and to where we shall return – “Heaven”, which has many forms or “levels” you could say! “Hell” does also, “the lake of fire and brimstone” and “bottomless pit” bits being only reserved for The Devil himself and his most ardent followers – The Antichrist (“The Beast”), the False Prophet, and yes, those “elites” that “fell down and worshipped” him in reality, as well as the entities from the spiritual dimensions and their off-spring that helped execute his will over mankind, through “all the kingdoms of this world”.

It is a big subject, which I won’t go into here, but “Heaven” and “Hell” are not what most people think. Nor is the understanding that most people have of why we end up in “either” or these places valid! Most folks “interpretations” of the scriptures in The Bible are far from accurate I’m afraid! Yet it is all there, all you need to know, from “beginning” to “end” (except there isn’t any “end” to this world, if you read it).

But back to “opting out”. How is it done? Well…

God has always been “outside the box” (because He just simply is!) and, knowing how we are as His creation, in our present state, He knew that our knowledge and understanding of Him and everything that He had made had been corrupted, almost right from the beginning of what we know as “time and space”. The result was that we “got separated”. We could no longer “walk with Him in The Garden”. We simply could no longer perceive Him as He originally created us and He intended our relationship to be like with Him. So He had to send a representation, an image of Himself into the box, so we could “see”! Guess Who?

Though “the story” has been told countless times over, there is only one way I can it explain myself personally, so I will. Following is the first chapter of my first book…


“There and back again” by Bilbo…..” er, no, that’s not right (ha ha!). I mean, “Why I do what I do!” – A true story, by David

“I was born in London, England, on January 20, 1954. My parents were typical working class (English expression, meaning definitely not rich, and even not having most of the things that people have today). We moved to a smaller town, outside of London, before I was two years old, for which I will be ever thankful. As such I grew up in a normal childhood, as my parents worked their way steadily upwards to middle class (meaning we started to get the stuff everyone now has these days, maybe not the best quality, but at least we had it). My Dad was a good-natured man, and very shrewd in his affairs, so I was never deprived, but then I was never really spoiled either. All in all, my parents did well, as well as could be expected of anyone I guess. There were some things I didn’t know though, and I didn’t find these out until much later, but when I did, it just made me love, respect, and appreciate them even more. But I’m getting ahead of myself here, so let’s go back to my childhood, and growing up.

I was a good boy. Never did anything really bad or naughty. Never got into fights, or used bad language. Never smoked, did drugs, or got any girls pregnant. I was in the Boy Scouts, learned Judo, played basketball for my school, won competitions for handwriting, was good at art. I liked learning and was considered above average in intelligence, but I hated school. It was a very lonely and mean environment, like a heartless machine, for turning out carbon copies of the same mindless robots that the society of my day was good at. Until I was fourteen, my ambition was to be a policeman, in order to help people.

My main interests, from about this time on, were music (The Beatles, The Beach Boys, the musical “Hair”, moving on eventually to Frank Zappa, Captain Beefheart, Soft Machine, etc), reading (“The Lion, the Witch & the Wardrobe” and the rest of “The Chronicles of Narnia” series by C.S. Lewis, “The Hobbit”, and then “The Lord of the Rings”). I was also into art and writing. I liked just going to places and watching people. It was the hippie era, and I was a baby-hippie, because I was still in school (until I was sixteen). I had one or two girlfriends, but nothing serious, as I was just too shy. Also, my standards were too high. I was a very lonely person. I had very high ideals, and very few people seemed to be capable of living up to them. For example, I wouldn’t make love to my girlfriends, because I didn’t want to use a condom, as I thought it was un-natural. This meant that if I did, there was a chance that my girlfriend would get pregnant, and I only wanted that responsibility with someone I knew I was prepared to spend the rest of my life with. Of course, this didn’t happen, though if it did, I would have been very happy for it to have occurred at a very young age, and then grow up with my kids. How many girls would have felt the same way though?

Though, as I said, my parents certainly did the best they could, they couldn’t answer the many questions I was starting to ask at this time. These are the real BIG questions about life of course. The teachers in school also couldn’t, neither could the scientists, and certainly not the politicians. To my mind, society was just a huge fabrication, false, a lie! Where was love? Where, or what, was the truth? Could someone please just give me a reason for existence?

The stock answers were always the same: “You’re born. You grow up. You go to school. You get an education in order to get a job, and a better education means a better job. Better job means more money. More money means you can have more things, including a wife, kids, a house, car, TV, etc, etc. And, you have to work at this all your life! In the end, if you live long enough, you get to retire and enjoy life, when you are too weak, sick or tired to do so, and then??? You die! That’s it!” “That’s it?” “Yep! That’s it!” “There’s nothing else?” “No!” “Are you kidding???”

I couldn’t accept this. It didn’t make sense. There had to be something more. If there wasn’t, then why would I want to waste my life, living it for nothing!!!??? These things were often the subject of many an argument with my parents, which was very difficult for them, I know.

During this time, I became friends with a new boy at my school. He had just moved from another area, and already he was the subject of much ridicule. As I was also on the outside, I guess we teamed up. We had the same or similar interests, so it was nice to not be so alone in everything I did. Basically, we actually took great delight in doing everything opposite to what everyone else was doing. We were not going to conform to society, peer pressure, whatever, we were going to do our own thing, in our own way, and to hell with anyone who didn’t understand.

I had three younger sisters (half-sisters I was to find out later), and no brothers. My friend, Graham, and I became very close, like brothers, and it was very special. We talked about everything, and I mean everything. Sometimes we would do this all through the night. Sometimes we wouldn’t talk at all, we would just know what the other one was thinking. It was really cool. The thing is we still couldn’t come up with answers, though we certainly had a lot of theories. We were friends for two to three years.

A few very significant things occurred at this time too. I saw a movie, called “Boy’s Town” (an old black and white film with Spencer Tracy, a true story), read an amazing article in the newspaper one day, and read a book called “The Cross and the Switchblade”, which Graham had read and given me to read. The amazing thing about each of these is that in each case there is a story about a person that suddenly had had a complete change in their life, to the point of becoming almost a different person. It was intriguing, but you can’t help thinking, “Well, great, for them! But what about my answers, where were they going to come from?”

At this time I wrote the following in my art book:

“Why am I here? Where can I go? What can I do? Who can I know? How?”

I was desperate, and I knew it! I remember telling my Mum one day, “Mum, if something doesn’t happen soon, I think I’m going to have to become a priest!”, but I didn’t mean anything to do with church, or churches. I didn’t really know what I meant. I certainly was not religious, in any sense of the word. I had never been interested in any religions, had never read anything about any of them, and was not about to start, for sure! To me, most of this sort of thing was as hypocritical, if not more so, than politics, and I simply thought it all smelled, really badly!!!

Then, one Thursday in the first week of September, 1971 (I was 17), Graham called me on the phone! I was at home. I had quit school the year before as I had found out I had all the exam passes I needed to go to art school, but had missed the enrollment, so I was just hanging around. This is what he said, “Dave, you need to come here right now!” (He was in another town, and was on his lunch break from his job at a Hi-Fi store). “Why? What’s up?” “Well, there are fifty people here that I’ve just met, and they love you, and want to meet you!” “What? Who? How?” “I don’t know, but they’re here, and I told them about you, and they said they’d like to meet you too!” “Woah! Just a minute!”

I asked my Mum if she could lend me the money to take the train to go see Graham, and meet these people. Unfortunately, she didn’t have it, so I couldn’t go. Graham said, “Okay”, and that he would try to find out all that he could, and then come over to our house the next day, and he could tell me all about it, which he did.

We went up to my room, and all I could understand from what he said was that these people smiled a lot, told everyone that they loved them, but that they talked about God, Jesus, and read from the Bible. And they were young, like us, the older ones not much more than their very early twenties. This was all very weird, and all I could say was, “Well, whatever turns them on, I guess!” They had given him a map, showing him how to find them, and all that was written on it was, “FREE – FOOD, MUSIC, LOVE!” along with the address and phone number. Food I didn’t need – my Dad was a chef. Music – I had plenty. But who was giving away free love, and how could they do this? Who were these people?

Thursday, Graham phoned. Friday, he came over to my house. Saturdays and Sundays I spent at his house, listening to music, all day and all night, only coming out of the room to get food, or to use the bathroom, which is what I was doing that weekend, until that Sunday morning!

We had decided to go swimming that morning, and after coming home and eating breakfast, had wandered out into the street for some air, before intending to go back up to our music room. We were just standing there, me, barefoot, in my home-made hippie-clothes (I made them myself), and Graham, in his smart-stuff, just looking at each other! “What do we do now?” “I don’t know!” “Let’s go see those people!” “Okay!” So we just walked down the road, got on the train, and went off to London. We didn’t even tell our families we were going, or where!

It took quite a while, as we had gotten on the wrong platform at one of the stations where we had to change trains, so we arrived in the afternoon. You could see the building where they were supposed to be through the window of the train, as it pulled into the station, and I had the strangest feeling. I looked at Graham and said, “Do you have the feeling that you are not going home today?” He said, “No”.

This building was the kind of building you would not find us dead in – an old, disused, red-brick factory. But something literally pulled me across the street, in through the doors, and up to a little room where we were met by a fellow with a big smile, who invited us to sign a visitor’s book, which we dutifully did. Someone was playing a guitar and singing somewhere in the distance. After we signed the book, he took us through to a huge room, which was basically a warehouse, and sat us down, while calling another guy to come over and talk with us. This other guy came over, and started talking to us about God, Jesus, the Bible, and so on. I wasn’t listening. But I was looking at everyone that I could see there, which turned out to be only a handful at the time. Almost everyone else was downtown at Hyde Park, and came back later that evening.

What I could see, and feel, was that everyone was smiling! There was just something very different about these people, and I didn’t know what it was. I’d never come across this before, and I knew it! I turned to Graham and said, “These people have got something. I don’t know what it is, but I know it’s good. I can feel it. I’m not leaving until I find out what it is!”

The guy that was talking to us heard this, so he stopped talking and just looked at me and said, “Would you like to pray and ask Jesus to come into your heart?” I had absolutely no idea what he was talking about! I certainly didn’t know how, or why, but I said “Yes!” I definitely did not know what was going to happen! But this is what happened…..

He called a couple of his friends over to join in with us. We held hands in a circle and closed our eyes. I had no idea what to do, so he just said, “Repeat after me…..” Which I did, sentence by sentence, as follows…..

“Jesus, please come into my heart. Please forgive me for all my sins. Help me to read your Word and understand it, and help me to love You and others. In Jesus’ name, Amen”

Pretty simple. Very short. But it changed everything!

I could explain all the actual physical sensations I felt in those moments, but these are not common experiences to everyone, so I won’t go into that, as it might be confusing. When I asked Him about those afterwards, He just explained that He allowed me to experience something that I could relate to, so I could clearly understand what it was that had actually transpired. (I can tell you later, if you’re interested).

What is important though is that you know this — remember those questions I had written in my art book? Well, He didn’t come along and answer with, “Answer to question number one is…..” etc, etc. What happened was that the questions themselves just vanished, disappeared, and deep inside I now knew, the reason for everything, in a moment! I knew I had found the “Truth”, “Peace”, “Love”, and “Freedom”, all in one go! I was flying, and I had to open my eyes to make sure I was still sitting on the ground! Right then, I couldn’t explain it though. I turned to Graham and said, “Graham, I don’t understand what just happened. All I know is that it did!”

That was actually the first moment of an existence I didn’t know was possible. It was like walking through into another dimension or something (which is what it is actually). All I can say is, that is what everything is for, and everyone should experience it! He is the reason, for everything! Wow! It is soooooooooo way beyond cool!

Since that moment, what can I say? That was years ago (nearly 44 now) on September 9, 1971.

I won’t write any more here, as it’s already very long. But there’s always more, much more. He never runs out, never fades, never fails, always has more, all we can take, much further and more “far out” than we can even imagine with our finite minds! And it’s all just right there, so close, and more “real” than all we can see, hear, feel, taste, and touch, with our natural senses!!! Wow!

I hope you’ve been able to get this far in reading this. But I will stop here. There is more coming though, if you can take it, okay?”


To be continued…

Comments Off on Following On… Posted in Posts

It All Fits!…

…And ties together!

This article contains a group of items that will basically be a Summary of what I had been trying to do with “The Genetic Wars” series.

You might wonder “how is it possible?” that I could make a statement like “this has been going on for not just decades, or centuries even, but for millennia!” Well, the following explains it! It even explains WHY we have seen such an exponential explosion of “progress” and “technological advancement” since the “industrial revolution”, bringing us up-to-date to where we are now! And “what follows next?”…

Please be aware that although these folks are Christian, you don’t have to be one to understand the SCIENCE that is involved and which is explained! AFTER you have watched and listened you might want to seriously consider that it is in your best interests to learn how to have faith however! Because…

Ephesians 6:12 — “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”

This is a LOT to try and absorb and IT IS ALL CONNECTED, and you might feel overwhelmed and incredulous. However, if you have ever had that sneaky suspicion that “something is not quite right with the world” then taking the time to take note of just these “headlines” should awaken you to what it is! There is a SCIENCE, REAL science to all of this, so if you are one of those who “only believes in science” and “none of that God, Jesus, Bible, Faith stuff” then this material is right up your street! This is as real as it gets people!

First up is an explanation of the CERN project by a scientist who is actually involved, explaining (leaking) the science of what they are doing, why, and what the results will be!

Next is a three part “introduction” to a field of study that simply should not be ignored! (You do so at your peril!)

And finally, a radio interview with the author in the previous videos above, tying together more details in a short concise manner! (The first twelve minutes or so are the hosts “headlines” before getting into the show properly)

These items only scratch the surface of things that EVERYONE should know and be aware of, because EVERYONE is affected ALREADY, and will be MORE so as we move forward in “time and space”, whether you have Faith or not! (BETTER to HAVE it folks!)

Ephesians 6:13 — “Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.”


P.S. Please note: Christians have a way of speaking with each other sometimes that does not easily resonate with those who are not. I understand this, but so should you if you are not one yourself. I tend to try and avoid terminology and phraseology like this myself, as I know that it can be distracting to those who are not “religious”. However, despite whatever may be thought of the way folks like these speak, it does not detract from the FACTS shared. Get past what you THINK, and tune in to the TRUTH, because there are very few other sources you are going to find it. Take care.

Always, David

Comments Off on It All Fits!… Posted in Posts

The Warning Prophecy! (Amended)


A series of unrelated events that you might call “coincidences” occurred with me recently, except that I do not believe in “coincidence” personally. My experience has always been along the lines of “hearing a voice behind me saying, ‘this is the way, walk in it'”. When I have complied I find I have witnessed “a miracle”. These events can be “small” or “great”, but they are NEVER “insignificant”. I always fare better when I follow, and I never regret “missing” whatever I might have been subject to if I hadn’t. I am happy not to know. One thing I have come to rely on is that I am always “guided into all TRUTH”, and as such I am kept free. The opposite would be of becoming subject to a lie, and thus becoming a slave. Anyway…

I won’t go into much detail of these aspects, but I will provide what I know happened. You may then make your own mind up what you believe about them. Please take the time to study. Here we go then…

First, I have been receiving correspondence from a friend who specializes in something I also have great interest in, end time prophecy and events. He proposed a fundamental change to an idea many have espoused for a long time. I won’t get into that here. Basically the conclusion he arrived at in his research is that a certain time-frame, generally understood by many, is not the case. (See amendment below). The only reason I thought it important is because it changes the sequence of events that we are supposed to be looking for as “signs” that tell us where we are in the end time scenario. Everything ELSE STILL applies, however in effect we could be a lot closer to how things are predicted than we might previously have understood. We will see.

(Amendment 24th April: Since publishing this other friends have pointed out other scriptures that show that my friends hypothesis does not fit, so I have withdrawn my previous comment. I did not go into the details here purposefully in the first place as it was not clear to me at the time anyway. I will try and be more diligent in future. Sorry.)

This is not my main point here though…

One thing I personally had been thinking about recently is a prophecy I have mentioned before, given to a prophetess in the U.S. in 1966, which has come to be known as “The Warning Prophecy”. (I will include it below). During our communications my friend made reference to this same prophecy just recently also, and again, we were not “comparing notes” at the time.

Then the other day I received an e-mail with a link to a video (which I will also include below). The significance of this particular video was not clear to me at first, as it was not “news” to me, just confirmation of things I already knew, until I got to the third part, then things started to fall into place as to “what was happening”. The video itself will require a bit of a prelude, for reasons that will become apparent, and it is not even complete. However it was a confirmation to me of the importance of getting this message out.

As if to practically scream that I was on the right track, just this morning, having already decided that I was going to write this item, I was looking at news items on the net and one of today’s headline articles had the very name mentioned in the prophecy given back in 1966! (See at the bottom)

All should become clear as I explain now. Read on…

Here is that “Warning Prophecy”, and I will interject a couple of comments where appropriate.

Turn your eyes towards Memphis (Egypt), for out of it shall come The Great Confusion!
The Author of Confusion (Satan/the Antichrist) is even now marshaling his forces (“the powers that be”) for this Great Confusion!
He is gathering his forces from an great nation and Eastern nations, friends that will join with him! (Just look at the current state of the world and the events taking place today, who the principle players are and how they are conducting their affairs)
So sudden will be The Great Confusion that it will cause a mighty widening of the eyes of those who have not discerned the signs of the times!
But be ye not deceived! Be prepared!
And be ye not deceived by the Great Society (The U.S.and all it stands for globally – “Babylon, The Great Whore” of The Book of Revelation fame! Read it for yourself and see if the description fits!), for it shall come to travail and then bring forth The Great Confusion! (Through its planned destruction and fall by the elites, after serving its purpose)
Be prepared!
Even now the skies are red, red with warning (current Blood Moon Tetrad?), and black, black with clouds gathering for The Great Confusion which is almost upon you!” (Red and Black are two of the Four Horsemen of The Apocalypse, representative of war and money/banking/business! – The other two are famine and plague/death and the Antichrist Himself)

You might wonder how “Memphis” could possibly be significant, and this is why you should watch the following video. Before you do I should give you a “head’s up” on a few points though, as follows…

Part One is mostly all about “that” event of “that” September, 2011. (If you still believe “the official version” after watching it then “more fool you” is all I can say). Please do not dismiss it though, whether you “believe” it or not, as it will lead you to question “how is it possible?”, which leads to Part Two. Which is the real eye-opener to the events of the last two to three hundred years of recent history (for any who are not already familiar with these things) that led us all to this mess called “the end time”. There IS a plan, an agenda, and I believe we are on the cusp of the fulfillment of the  “elites” proposed agenda, hence the “Warning”.

To understand where the “power” of everything originated, all the way back to “Memphis”, you need to watch Part Three (which is not complete I’m afraid, but should give you some idea of “where to look” in your own investigation). There is a proviso however…

It is imperative to understand that these things are SPIRITUALLY based, which is WHY they have been around for millennia. The current “powers that be” WORSHIP these very SAME entities, and THIS is the “war” that has been going on between God’s own and “Satan’s seed” since the beginning. For this reason I have to point out that many scholars and researchers who have conducted sincere and thorough investigations, but who have not had faith themselves, have often resigned and confined their findings to secular means and resources, often referring to the very “history” and “findings” ALREADY provided by “the powers that be” THEMSELVES for the world’s populations to swallow. It’s “a double whammy” I’m afraid.

In short, you can either believe God Himself, by faith, or you are left with the alternative. Some very sincere folks come so close, yet so far. It is either “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth” or, like rat poison, it is mostly good, with just enough bad to kill you, IF you cannot discern the difference.

All that to say that though I agree with the material presented in the video, which is extremely well compiled, I tend to “part company” when anyone starts to try to debunk the Scriptures. I am no dummy. I have undeniable personal proof that His Word is true, and have experienced it being proven true to me personally by Himself. The whole Book is a miracle in itself, but I am not going to go into that here.

Before the video, one last comment…

“History” is generally written by “who”? ALL the books in the WHOLE world are written by “who”? “Who” do you WANT to believe? The “evidence” that God provides to those who really want to know is  He Himself, personally! If you would rather believe any man, whoever they may be, no matter how “good” or “evil” intentioned, myself included, you are NOT going to arrive at the conclusions that will get you to the destination He has for you! It is all down to free will and choice! It’s YOUR decision. The “information” provided FOR you by men and women of the world is always going to fall short, “ever learning, but never coming to a knowledge of the Truth”, and MOST of the current knowledge fields are literally “crafted” (as in witchcraft) to keep us FROM the truth, appealing to our senses, but not to our souls and spirits. Take note folks, please!

That is all I will say on that. “The ONLY way out is UP” folks! Anyway, here is the video…

And as if to confirm that I was on the right track today, here is the news item…

Russian archaeologists excavate ‘White Walls’ of ancient Egyptian capital Memphis
April 20, 2015 04:59

A Russian archaeological expedition spanning more than a decade has unearthed the enclosure walls of the first capital of Egypt – the legendary city of Memphis that was the heart of Egyptian civilization for over 2,000 years.

Scientists from the Egyptology Studies Center of Russian Academy of Sciences (CESRAS) have excavated the foundation of what they believe once were huge walls that used to surround the ancient Egyptian capital currently known under its Greek name, Memphis.
The success of the Russian effort to bring to light part of the 5,200 year-old walls was confirmed by Egypt’s Antiquities Minister Mamdouh al-Damaty.

“Several white limestone fragments of the ancient capital’s wall were discovered during excavation work carried out by an archaeology team of the Russian Institute of Egyptology at Kom Tuman, south of Giza Pyramids,” said Damaty.

“We hope this finding will enhance our knowledge of one the most important cities of Ancient Egypt. Memphis played a significant political, religious and economic role in the history of the country. One of its names was Inbu-Hedj, or the White Walls,” the minister said.

Excavations on the new wall in Memphis will last for unknown time as the occupation layer reached 15 meters, as was revealed during control drilling on the site, CESRAS director Galina Belova told RT.

“Conceptually, this archaeological site is inexhaustible,”Belova said. “If only we had…better financing, we would made the excavation site much larger, but unfortunately, under-financing narrows our research a great deal,” she said.

Fifteen years ago, when Russian Egyptologists first obtained a concession from the Egyptian government, they were looking at three sites that used to be the highest hills once hosting the city in the ancient Nile’s delta.

Parts of the walls which were unearthed at the Kom Tuman archaeological site are very rich in handicraft findings, as the CERES expedition has already found quite a lot of artisan production shops, including a number of pottery making ovens and bronze tools.

While Egyptian authorities are taking efforts to maintain free and secure conditions for Russian archaeologists on the site, Belova said that amid turbulence following the revolution some of the locals have been devastating archaeological sites.

“As soon as we leave an excavation they dig it with holes in hope that we have hidden some kind of gold things there. The farmers desperately need land and they occupy more and more territories that are actually historic sites,” Belova said, stressing that Egyptian officials are very helpful and assist a lot to the scientists, while for the local population history is something out of their world.

The scientists have addressed Egyptian Ministry of Antiquities to prevent spoliation of the archaeological site of Memphis. The ministry promised to block off the Kom Tuman Complex with high wall similar to the one already erected around another ancient city of Luxor.

Belova informed RT that many foreign scientists are working with Russian colleagues as members of the CESRAS expedition in Egypt. Egyptologists from Austria, Germany, the US and many other countries are taking part in excavations.

Originally, Memphis was centered around a pharaoh palace erected on a platform to dominate the nearby territory. The palace was surrounded by a large number of military headquarters and fortifications that occupied a huge territory estimated 500 hectares.

Memphis is now an open-air museum is multilateral, and while the deepest layers are dated before 3,000 BC, the city lasted for over 2,500 years, with one of the latest, the 26th pharaoh dynasty, also constructing a palace on the remaining foundations of the ancient buildings.

Comments Off on The Warning Prophecy! (Amended) Posted in Posts

The Genetic Wars – part 6

The Genetic Wars – part 6

I had been procrastinating about finishing this series for the longest time, knowing that it would be a lot of work to summarize it all in simple terms everyone could understand. Then my dear friend John brought my attention to the following radio show, which has saved me all the trouble! 😀

A few things to bear in mind…

This broadcast is almost three hours long. If you find it easier then you can break it down into three one-hour segments. I highly recommend that you do not dismiss the opportunity altogether, as there is so much information contained in the show that you are going to wish you hadn’t missed it if you do so.

This was originally broadcast in January 2013, however in the first hour you will find reference to the CERN Large Hadron Collider being restarted this year, 2015, among a lot of other things.

The third hour sums up what I have been trying to point out about the whole genetic war that has been going on for millennia now, and it does it so much better than I could.

The middle hour is going to boggle your mind, if you can handle it. You should force yourself to, because as the presenters put it, it is “in your face” already and is inescapable. If you don’t want to be found to be amongst those who are deceived, then it is just smart to consider the facts, detailed information shared from those who are really “in the know”.

The presenters, Tom Horn, Steve Quayle, and their associates are no dummies. They do their homework, and then some. They go right to the provable sources for their information, and they have been doing this for decades. These are not “weirdos” but intelligent men who have taken great personal risk to share their findings.

You don’t have to be a Christian to see that what is stated IS “so”. The facts speak for themselves. However, if you can receive the Biblical knowledge as explained by these men of faith, you will see for yourself how “so” the scriptures are. Not as “fanciful”, but very much as “The Horse’s Mouth” has told it from the beginning!

One thing I will tell you is this – your understanding of the difference between the reality of the Truth, and the surreal lie that most of humanity has lived under for thousands of years will become VERY apparent. What you do with it will be up to you of course.

Everything fits. It all ties in, and if you are interested at all in understanding what is really going on, who is responsible, what is already happening and is going to happen very soon now (this year, on through the next, culminating by 2017 – going by the elites’ own time-table) then perhaps it is time to “listen up”!

Anyway, here it is. Please pay attention. This is no small stuff.

By the way, if you ever wondered why God was so “judgmental” in some of the stories of the Old Testament (and throughout history), the explanations in this radio show should make it very apparent. Those “judged” were NOT HUMAN! God has always been trying to preserve His creation, not demon-possessed hybrids whose intentions are to corrupt and destroy His ultimate creation made in His Own Image – US!

Comments Off on The Genetic Wars – part 6 Posted in Posts

Theory? or Fact?


First, news:

The third blood moon of the current Tetrad was over the U.S. in the early hours of Saturday. It was the shortest eclipse in its “total” state recorded, though the whole process from beginning to end was one of the longest. Significant? Probably!

The CERN collider re-start was delayed due to a short-circuit in one of its magnets, and initially it was thought that the fix would take several weeks. However, things have gone quicker and better than they expected and they say they plan for the restart next week now. If you read the write up on it you will see that they plan for all kinds of “new experiments”, and the machine will now be running at full-speed. “Playing with fire”? You betcha!

Following is a transcript of two tapes recorded in 1988. They are a recollection of a seminar given by a doctor “in the know” to a group of other doctors in 1969. During that seminar no recording devices or note-taking was allowed, which is very unusual for a seminar. The speaker was very careful not to mention names, and indicated that the knowledge he was sharing was very dangerous, and life-threatening if it was found to have been “leaked”. The author of the tapes could note that many of the predictions made in the 1969 seminar had already been fulfilled by 1988, just 20 years after, which is why he was recording his recollections. We are now 45 years further on from that seminar. Just see for yourself if “conspiracy” is just a “theory”, or an actual fact! Reading just the paragraph headlines should cause enough concern in the average person to make them re-assess how they see and understand most of the things they have come to accept as “normal”.

Even if the tape author “made it all up” himself, or “had selective memory” in his account of the topics shared in the seminar, here we are, 25 years on from his 1988 recordings, seeing that these things are so!

See for your self…

NWO Plans Exposed by Insider in 1969(Rense) –
‘This is a transcript of two out of three tapes on the “New World System.” Tapes one and two were recorded in 1988 and are the recollections of Dr. Lawrence Dunegan regarding a lecture he attended on March 20, 1969 at a meeting of the Pittsburgh Paediatric Society. The lecturer at that gathering of paediatricians (identified in tape three recorded in 1991) was a Dr. Richard Day (who died in 1989). At the time, Dr. Day was Professor of Paediatrics at Mount Sinai Medical School in New York. Previously he had served as Medical Director of Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
Dr. Dunegan was formerly a student of Dr. Day at the University of Pittsburgh and was well acquainted with him, though not intimately. He describes Dr. Day as an insider of the “Order” and although Dr. Dunegan’s memory was somewhat dimmed by the intervening years, he is able to provide enough details of the lecture to enable any enlightened person to discern the real purposes behind the trends of our time. This is a transcript of a loose, conversational monologue that makes for better listening than reading.
The transcripts of Tape 1 and Tape 2 have been very slightly edited to remove verbal mannerisms and to improve readability.
The original unedited transcript may be found using the following link 3 is an interview by Randy Engel, Director of the U.S. Coalition for Life, with Dr. Larry Dunegan and was recorded on Oct. 10, 1991 in Pittsburgh, Penn.This set of three audio tapes may be ordered from the Florida Pro-family Forum, P.O. Box 1059, Highland City, FL 33846-1059 ($20.00).

There has been much written, and much said, by some people who have looked at all the changes that have occurred in American society in the past 20 years or so, and who have looked retrospectively to earlier history of the United States, and indeed, of the world, and come to the conclusion that there is a conspiracy of sorts which influences, indeed controls. major historical events, not only in the United States, but also around the world. This conspiratorial interpretation of history is based on people making observations from the outside, gathering evidence and concluding that from the outside they see a conspiracy. Their evidence and conclusions are based on evidence gathered in retrospect.
I want to now describe what I heard from a speaker in 1969, which in several weeks will now be 20 years ago. The speaker did not speak in terms of retrospect, but rather predicting changes that would be brought about in the future. The speaker was not looking from the outside in, thinking that he saw conspiracy, rather, he was on the inside, admitting that, indeed, there was an organised power, force, group of men, who wielded enough influence to determine major events involving countries around the world. In addition, he predicted, or rather expounded on, changes that were planned for the remainder of this century.
As you listen, if you can recall the situation, at least in the United States in 1969 and the few years there after, and then recall the kinds of changes which have occurred between then and now, almost 20 years later, I believe you will be impressed with the degree to which the things that were planned to be brought about have already been accomplished. Some of the things that were discussed were not intended to be accomplished yet by 1988. [Note: the year of this recording] but are intended to be accomplished before the end of this century. There is a timetable; and it was during this session that some of the elements of the timetable were brought out.
Anyone who recalls early in the days of the Kennedy campaign when he spoke of progress in the decade of the 60′s”: That was kind of a cliché in those days – “the decade of the 60′s.” Well, by 1969 our speaker was talking about the decade of the 70′s, the decade of the 80′s, and the decade of the 90′s. Prior to that time, I don’t remember anybody saying “the decade of the 40′s and the decade of the 50′s. So I think this overall plan and timetable had taken important shape with more predictability to those who control it, sometime in the late 50′s. That’s speculation on my part. In any event, the speaker said that his purpose was to tell us about changes which would be brought about in the next 30 years or so, so that an entirely new world-wide system would be in operation before the turn of the century. As he put it, “We plan to enter the 21st Century with a running start.” [emphasis supplied]

He said, as we listened to what he was about to present, “Some of you will think I’m talking about Communism. Well, what I’m talking about is much bigger than Communism!” At that time he indicated that there is much more co-operation between East and West than most people realise.
In his introductory remarks, he commented that he was free to speak at this time. He would not have been able to say what he was about to say, even a few years earlier. But he was free to speak at this time because now, and I’m quoting here, “everything is in place and nobody can stop us now.”
He went on to say that most people don’t understand how governments operate and even people in high positions in governments, including our own, don’t really understand how and where decisions are made. He went on to say that people who really influence decisions are names that for the most part would be familiar to most of us, but he would not use individuals’ names or names of any specific organisation. But that, if he did, most of the people would be names that were recognised by most of his audience. He went on to say that they were not primarily people in public office, but people of prominence who were primarily known in their private occupations or private positions.
The speaker was Dr. Richard Day, a doctor of medicine and a former professor at a large Eastern university, and he was addressing a group of doctors of medicine, about 80 in number. His name would not be widely recognised by anybody likely to hear this. The only purpose in recording this is that it may give a perspective to those who hear it regarding the changes which have already been accomplished in the past 20 years or so, and a bit of a preview to what at least some people are planning for the remainder of this century, so that they would enter the 21st Century with a flying start. Some of us may not enter that Century.
His purpose in telling our group about these changes that were to be brought about was to make it easier for us to adapt to these changes. Indeed, as he quite accurately said, “they would be changes that would be very surprising, and in some ways difficult for people to accept,” and he hoped that we, as sort of his friends, would make the adaptation more easily if we knew somewhat beforehand what to expect.

Somewhere in the introductory remarks he insisted that nobody have a tape recorder and that nobody take notes, which for a professor was a very remarkable kind of thing to expect from an audience.
Something in his remarks suggested that there could be negative repercussions against him if it became widely known that indeed he had spilled the beans, so to speak. When I first heard that, I thought maybe that was sort of an ego trip, somebody enhancing his own importance. But as the revelations unfolded, I began to understand why he might have had some concern about not having it widely known what was said although this was a fairly public forum where he was speaking. Nonetheless, he asked that no notes be taken, no tape recording be used. This was suggesting there might be some personal danger to himself if these revelations were widely publicised.
Again, as the remarks began to unfold, and heard the rather outrageous things that were said, I made it a point to try to remember as much of what he said as I could and to connect my recollections to simple events around me to aid my memory for the future, in case I wanted to do what I’m doing now – recording this. I also wanted to try to maintain a perspective on what would be developing, if indeed, it followed the predicted pattern – which it has!
At this point, so that I don’t forget to include it later, I’ll just include some statements that were made from time to time throughout the presentation. One of the statements was having to do with change. The statement was, “People will have to get used to the idea of change, so used to change, that they’ll be expecting change. Nothing will be permanent.”
This often came out in the context of a society where people seemed to have no roots or moorings, but would be passively willing to accept change simply because it was all they had ever known. This was sort of in contrast to generations of people up until this time where certain things you expected to be, and remain in place as reference points for your life. So change was to be brought about, change was to be anticipated and expected, and accepted, no questions asked.
Another comment that was made from time to time during the presentation was. “People are too trusting, people don’t ask the right questions.” Sometimes, being too trusting was equated with being too dumb. But sometimes when he would say that “People don’t ask the right questions,” it was almost with a sense of regret as if he were uneasy with what he was part of, and wished that people would challenge it and maybe not be so trusting.
Another comment that was repeated from time to time, particularly in relation to changing laws and customs was, “Everything has two purposes. One is the ostensible purpose which will make it acceptable to people and second is the real purpose which would further the goals of establishing the new system.
Frequently he would say, “There is just no other way, there’s just no other way!” This seemed to come as a sort of an apology, particularly at the conclusion of describing some particularly offensive changes. For example, the promotion of drug addiction which we’ll get into later.
He was very active with population control groups, the population control movement, and population control was really the entry point into specifics following the introduction.
He said the population is growing too fast. Numbers of people living at any one time on the planet must be limited or we will run out of space to live. We will outgrow our food supply and will pollute the world with our waste.

People won’t be allowed to have babies just because they want to or because they are careless. Most families would be limited to two. Some people would be allowed only one, however outstanding people might be selected and allowed to have three. But most people would be allowed to have only two babies. That’s because the zero population growth rate is 2.1 children per completed family. So something like every 10th family might be allowed the privilege of the third baby.
To me, up to this point, the words ‘population control’ primarily connoted limiting the number of babies to be born. But this remark about what people would be ‘allowed’ and then what followed, made it quite clear that when you hear ‘population control’ that means more than just controlling births. It means control of every endeavour of an entire world population; a much broader meaning to that term than I had ever attached to it before hearing this.
As you listen and reflect back on some of the things you hear, you will begin to recognise how one aspect dovetails with other aspects in terms of controlling human endeavours.
Well, from population control, the natural next step then was sex. He said sex must be separated from reproduction. Sex is too pleasurable, and the urges are too strong, to expect people to give it up.
Chemicals in food and in the water supply to reduce the sex drive are not practical. The strategy then would be not to diminish sex activity, but to increase sex activity, but in such a way, that people won’t be having babies.
The first consideration here was contraception. Contraception would be very strongly encouraged, and it would be connected closely in people’s minds with sex. They would automatically think contraception when they were thinking or preparing for sex, and contraception would be made universally available.
Contraceptives would be displayed much more prominently in drug stores, right up with the cigarettes and chewing gum. Out in the open rather than hidden under the counter where people would have to ask for them and maybe be embarrassed.
This kind of openness was a way of suggesting that contraceptives are just as much a part of life as any other items sold in the store.
Contraceptives would be advertised and also dispensed in the schools in association with sex education!
The sex education was to get kids interested early, making the connection between sex and the need for contraception early in their lives, even before they became very active.
At this point I was recalling some of my teachers, particularly in high school and found it totally unbelievable to think of them agreeing, much less participating in, and distributing of contraceptives to students. But, that only reflected my lack of understanding of how these people operate. That was before the school-based clinic programs got started. Many cities in the United States by this time have already set up school-based clinics, which are primarily contraception, birth control, population control clinics.
The idea then is that the connection between sex and contraception introduced and reinforced in school would carry over into marriage. Indeed, if young people when they matured decided to get married, marriage itself would be diminished in importance. He indicated some recognition that most people probably would want to be married, but this certainly would not be any longer considered necessary for sexual activity.
No surprise then that the next item was abortion. And this, now back in 1969, four years before Roe vs. Wade, he said, “Abortion will no longer be a crime.” Abortion will be accepted as normal, and would be paid for by taxes for people who could not pay for their own abortions.
Contraceptives would be made available by tax money so that nobody would have to do without contraceptives.
If school sex programs would lead to more pregnancies in children, that was really seen as no problem. Parents who think they are opposed to abortion on moral or religious grounds will change their minds when it is their own child who is pregnant. So this will help overcome opposition to abortion.
Before long, only a few die-hards will still refuse to see abortion as acceptable, and they won’t matter anymore.
“People will be given permission to be homosexual,” that’s the way it was stated. They won’t have to hide it.
In addition, elderly people will be encouraged to continue to have active sex lives into the very old ages, just as long as they can. Everyone will be given permission to have sex, to enjoy however they want. Anything goes. This is the way it was put.
In addition, I remember thinking, “How arrogant for this individual, or whoever he represents, to feel that they can give or withhold permission for people to do things!” But that was the terminology that was used.
In this regard, clothing was mentioned. Clothing styles would be made more stimulating and provocative. Back in 1969 was the time of the mini skirt, when those mini-skirts were very, very high and very revealing. He said, “It is not just the amount of skin that is exposed that makes clothing sexually seductive, but other, more subtle things are often suggestive.” Things like movement, and the cut of clothing, and the kind of fabric, the positioning of accessories on the clothing. “If a woman has an attractive body, why should she not show it?” was one of the statements. There was no detail on what was meant by ‘provocative clothing’, but since that time if you watched the change in clothing styles, blue jeans are cut in a way that they’re more tight-fitting in the crotch. They form wrinkles. Wrinkles are essentially arrows. Lines which direct one’s vision to certain anatomic areas.
This was around the time of the ‘burn your bra’ activity. He indicated that a lot of women should not go without a bra. They need a bra to be attractive, so instead of banning bras and burning them, bras would come back. But they would be thinner and softer allowing more natural movement. It was not specifically stated, but certainly, a very thin bra is much more revealing of the nipple and what else is underneath, than the heavier bras that were in style up to that time.
Earlier he said that sex and reproduction would be separated. You would have sex without reproduction and then technology was reproduction without sex. This would be done in the laboratory. He indicated that already much, much research was underway about making babies in the laboratory.
There was some elaboration on that, but I don’t remember the details. How much of that technology has come to my attention since that time. I don’t remember in a way that I can distinguish what was said from what I subsequently have learned as general medical information.
Families would be limited in size. We already alluded to not being allowed more than two children.
Divorce would be made easier and more prevalent. Most people who marry will marry more than once. More people will not marry. Unmarried people would stay in hotels and even live together. That would be very common – nobody would even ask questions about it. It would be widely accepted as no different from married people being together.
More women will work outside the home. More men will be transferred to other cities and in their jobs, more men would travel. Therefore, it would be harder for families to stay together. This would tend to make the marriage relationship less stable and, therefore, tend to make people less willing to have babies. The extended families would be smaller, and more remote.
Travel would be easier, less expensive, for a while, so that people who did have to travel would feel they could get back to their families, not that they were abruptly being made remote from their families. But one of the net effects of easier divorce laws combined with the promotion of travel, and transferring families from one city to another, was to create instability in the families. If both husband and wife are working and one partner is transferred, the other one may not be easily transferred. Soon, either gives up his or her job and stays behind while the other leaves, or else gives up the job and risks not finding employment in the new location. Rather a diabolical approach to this whole thing!
Everybody has a right to live only so long. The old are no longer useful. They become a burden. You should be ready to accept death. Most people are. An arbitrary age limit could be established. After all, you have a right to only so many steak dinners, so many orgasms, and so many good pleasures in life. After you have had enough of them and you’re no longer productive, working, and contributing, then you should be ready to step aside for the next generation.
Some things that would help people realise that they had lived long enough, he mentioned several of these. I don’t remember them all but here are a few, the use of very pale printing ink on forms that people are necessary to fill out.
Older people wouldn’t be able to read the pale ink as easily and would need to go to younger people for help. Automobile traffic patterns, there would be more high-speed traffic lanes that older people with their slower reflexes would have trouble dealing with and thus, loses some of their independence.
A big item that was elaborated on at some length was the cost of medical care would be made burdensomely high. Medical care would be connected very closely with one’s work but also would be made very, very high in cost so that it would simply be unavailable to people beyond a certain time. Unless they had a remarkably rich, supporting family, they would just have to do without care.
And the idea was that if everybody says, “Enough! What a burden it is on the young to try to maintain the old people,” then the young would become agreeable to helping Mom and Dad along the way, provided this was done humanely and with dignity. Then the example was – there could be a nice, farewell party, a real celebration. Mom and Dad had done a good job. Then after the party’s over they take the ‘demise pill’.
The next topic is Medicine. There would be profound changes in the practice of medicine. Overall, medicine would be much more tightly controlled. The observation that was made in 1969 that, “Congress is not going to go along with national health insurance, is now, abundantly evident. But it’s not necessary, we have other ways to control health care”. These would come about more gradually, but all health care delivery would come under tight control. Medical care would be closely connected to work. If you don’t work or can’t work, you won’t have access to medical care. The days of hospitals giving away free care would gradually wind down, to where it was virtually non-existent. Costs would be forced up so that people won’t be able to afford to go without insurance. People pay for it, you’re entitled to it.
It was only subsequently that I began to realise the extent to which you would not be paying for it. Your medical care would be paid for by others. Therefore, you would gratefully accept, on bended knee, what was offered to you as a privilege. Your role being responsible for your own care would be diminished.
As an aside here, this is not something that was developed at that time; I didn’t understand it at the time that it was an aside.
The way this works, everybody has been made dependent on insurance and if you don’t have insurance then you pay directly; the cost of your care is enormous. The insurance company, however, paying for your care, does not pay that same amount. If you are charged, say, $600 for the use of an operating room, the insurance company does not pay $600; they only pay $300 or $400. That differential in billing has the desired effect: It enables the insurance company to pay for that which you could never pay for. They get a discount that’s unavailable to you. When you see your bill you’re grateful that the insurance company could do that. And in this way you are dependent, and virtually required to have insurance. The whole billing is fraudulent.
Access to hospitals would be tightly controlled and identification would be needed to get into the building. The security in and around hospitals would be established and gradually increased so that nobody without identification could get in or move around inside the building.
Theft of hospital equipment, things like typewriters and microscopes and so forth would be ‘allowed’ and exaggerated; reports of it would be exaggerated so that this would be the excuse needed to establish the need for strict security until people got used to it. Anybody moving about the hospital would be required to wear an identification badge with a photograph and telling why he was there, employee or lab technician or visitor or whatever. This is to be brought in gradually, getting everybody used to the idea of identifying themselves – until it was just accepted. This need for ID to move about would start in small ways: hospitals, some businesses, but gradually expand to include everybody in all places!
It was observed that hospitals can be used to confine people and for the treatment of criminals. This did not mean, necessarily, medical treatment. At that time I did not know the term ‘Psycho-Prison’ ­ they are in the Soviet Union, but, without trying to recall all the details, basically, he was describing the use of hospitals both for treating the sick, and for confinement of criminals for reasons other than the medical well-being of the criminal. The definition of criminal was not given.
The image of the doctor would change. No longer would he be seen as an individual professional in service to individual patients. But the doctor would be gradually recognized as a highly skilled technician – and his job would change. The job is to include things like executions by lethal injection.
The image of the doctor being a powerful, independent person would have to be changed. He went on to say, “Doctors are making entirely too much money. They should advertise like any other product.” Lawyers would be advertising too.
Keep in mind, this was an audience of doctors; being addressed by a doctor. And it was interesting that he would make some rather insulting statements to his audience without fear of antagonizing us.
The solo practitioner would become a thing of the past. A few die-hards might try to hold out, but most doctors would be employed by an institution of one kind or another. Group practice would be encouraged, corporations would be encouraged, and then once the corporate image of medical care gradually became more and more acceptable, doctors would more and more become employees rather than independent contractors. Along with that, of course, unstated but necessary, is the employee serves his employer, not his patient. So we’ve already seen quite a lot of that in the last 20 years. And apparently more on the horizon.
The term HMO was not used at that time, but as you look at HMO’s you see this is the way that medical care is being taken over since the National Health Insurance approach did not get through the Congress. A few die-hard doctors may try to make a go of it, remaining in solo practice, remaining independent, which, parenthetically, is me but they would suffer a great loss of income. They’d be able to scrape by, maybe, but never really live comfortably as would those who were willing to become employees of the system. Ultimately, there would be no room at all for the solo practitioner after the system is entrenched.
The next heading to talk about is Health and Disease. He said there would be new diseases to appear which had not ever been seen before. Would be very difficult to diagnose and be untreatable – at least for along time. No elaboration was made on this, but I remember, not long after hearing this presentation, when I had a puzzling diagnosis to make, I would be wondering, “Is this a case of what he was talking about?”
Some years later AIDS developed. I think AIDS was at least one example of what he was talking about. I now think that AIDS probably was a manufactured disease.
Cancer. He said. “We can cure almost every cancer right now. Information is on file in the Rockefeller Institute, if it’s ever decided that it should be released. But consider – if people stop dying of cancer, how rapidly we would become overpopulated. You may as well die of cancer as of something else.”
Efforts at cancer treatment would be geared more toward comfort than toward cure. There was some statement that ultimately the cancer cures which were being hidden in the Rockefeller Institute would come to light because independent researchers might bring them out, despite these efforts to suppress them. But at least for the time being, letting people die of cancer was a good thing to do because it would slow down the problem of overpopulation.
Another very interesting thing was heart attacks. He said, “There is now a way to simulate a real heart attack. It can be used as a means of assassination.” Only a very skilled pathologist who knew exactly what to look for at an autopsy, could distinguish this from the real thing.
I thought that was a very surprising and shocking thing to hear from this particular man at that particular time. This, and the business of the cancer cure, really still stand out sharply in my memory, because they were so shocking and, at that time, seemed to me out of character.
He then went on to talk about nutrition and exercise sort of in the same framework. People would have to eat right and exercise right to live as long as before. Most won’t. This in the connection of nutrition, there was no specific statement that I can recall as to particular nutrients that would be either inadequate or in excess. In retrospect, I tend to think he meant high salt diets and high fat diets would predispose toward high blood pressure and premature arteriosclerotic heart disease. And that if people who were too dumb or too lazy to exercise as they should then their circulating fats go up and predispose to disease. He also said something about diet information would be widely available, but most people, particularly stupid people, who had no right to continue living anyway, would ignore the advice and just go on and eat what was convenient and tasted good.
There were some other unpleasant things said about food. I just can’t recall what they were. But I do remember having reflections about wanting to plant a garden in the backyard to get around whatever these contaminated foods would be. I regret I don’t remember the details about nutrition and hazardous nutrition.
With regard to exercise, he went on to say that more people would be exercising more, especially running, because everybody can run. You don’t need any special equipment or place. You can run wherever you are. As he put it. “people will be running all over the place.”
And in this vein, he pointed out how supply produces demand. And this was in reference to athletic clothing and equipment. As this would be made more widely available and glamorised, particularly as regards running shoes, this would stimulate people to develop an interest in running as part of a whole sort of public propaganda campaign. People would be encouraged then to buy the attractive sports equipment and to get into exercise.
In connection with nutrition he also mentioned that public eating places would rapidly increase. That this had a connection with the family too. As more and more people eat out, eating at home would become less important. People would be less dependent on their kitchens at home. And then this also connected to convenience foods being made widely available – things like you could pop into the microwave. Whole meals would be available pre-fixed. And of course we’ve now seen this. But this whole different approach to eating out and to previously prepared meals being eaten in the home was predicted at that time to be brought about.
The convenience foods would be part of the hazards. Anybody who was lazy enough to want the convenience foods rather than fixing his own also had better be energetic enough to exercise. Because if he was too lazy to exercise and too lazy to fix his own food, then he didn’t deserve to live very long.
This was all presented as sort of a moral judgement about people and what they should do with their energies. People who are smart, who would learn about nutrition, and who are disciplined enough to eat right and exercise right are better people – and the kind you want to live longer.
Somewhere along in here there was also something about accelerating the onset of puberty. And this was said in connection with health, and later in connection with education, and connecting to accelerating the process of evolutionary change. There was a statement that “we think that we can push evolution faster and in the direction we want it to go.”
I remember this only as a general statement. I don’t recall if any details were given beyond that.
Another area of discussion was Religion. This is an avowed atheist speaking. He said, “Religion is not necessarily bad. A lot of people seem to need religion, with it’s mysteries and rituals – so they will have religion. But the major religions of today have to be changed because they are not compatible with the changes to come. The old religions will have to go especially Christianity.
Once the Roman Catholic Church is brought down, the rest of Christianity will follow easily. Then a new religion can be accepted for use all over the world. It will incorporate something from all of the old ones to make it more easy for people to accept , and feel at home. Most people won’t be too concerned with religion. They will realise that they don’t need it.”
In order to do this, the Bible will be changed. It will be rewritten to fit the new religion. Gradually, key words will be replaced with new words having various shades of meaning. Then the meaning attached to the new word can be close to the old word – and as time goes on, other shades of meaning of that word can be emphasised. and then gradually that word replaced with another word.”
I don’t know if I’m making that clear, but the idea is that everything in Scripture need not be rewritten, just key words replaced by other words. The variability in meaning attached to any word can be used as a tool to change the entire meaning of Scripture, and therefore make it acceptable to this new religion. Most people won’t know the difference; and this was another one of the times where he said, “the few who do notice the difference won’t be enough to matter.”
Then followed one of the most surprising statements of the whole presentation: He said, “Some of you probably think the Churches won’t stand for this,” and he went on to say, “the churches will help us!” There was no elaboration on this, it was unclear just what he had in mind when he said, “the churches will help us!”
In retrospect I think some of us now can understand what he might have meant at that time. I recall then only of thinking, “no they won’t!” and remembering our Lord’s words where he said to Peter, “Thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build my Church, and gates of Hell will not prevail against it.”
So yes, some people in the Churches might help and in the subsequent 20 years we’ve seen how some people in Churches have helped. But we also know that our Lord’s Words will stand, and the gates of Hell will not prevail.
Another area of discussion was Education. In connection with education and remembering what he said about religion, was in addition to changing the Bible he said that the classics in Literature would be changed. I seem to recall Mark Twain’s writings was given as one example. But he said that the casual reader reading a revised version of a classic would never even suspect that there was any change. Somebody would have to go through word by word to even recognise that any change was made in these classics, the changes would be so subtle. But the changes would be such as to promote the acceptability of the new system.
As regards education, he indicated that kids would spend more time in schools, but in many schools they wouldn’t learn anything. They’ll learn some things, but not as much as formerly. Better schools in better areas with better people, their kids will learn more. In the better schools Iearning would be accelerated.
This is another time where he said, “We think we can push evolution.” By pushing kids to learn more he seemed to be suggesting that their brains would evolve, that their offspring would evolve; sort of pushing evolution where kids would learn and be more intelligent at a younger age. As if this pushing would alter their physiology.
Overall, schooling would be prolonged. This meant prolonged through the school year. I’m not sure what he said about a long school day, I do remember he said that school was planned to go all summer, that the summer school vacation would become a thing of the past. Not only for schools, but for other reasons. People would begin to think of vacation times year round, not just in the summer. For most people it would take longer to complete their education. To get what originally had been in a bachelor’s program would now require advanced degrees and more schooling. So that a lot of school time would be just wasted time.
Good schools would become more competitive. I inferred when he said that, that he was including all schools – elementary up through college – but I don’t recall if he actually said that.
Students would have to decide at a younger age what they would want to study and get onto their track early. It would be harder to change to another field of study once you get started. Studies would be concentrated in much greater depth, but narrowed. You wouldn’t have access to material in other fields, outside your own area of study, without approval. This seem to be more where he talked about limited access to other fields. I seem to recall this as being more at the college level perhaps. People would be very specialised in their own area of expertise. But they won’t be able to get a broad education and won’t be able to understand what is going on overall.
He was already talking about computers in education, and at that time he said anybody who wanted computer access, or access to books that were not directly related to their field of study would have to have a very good reason for so doing. Otherwise, access would be denied.
Another angle was that the schools would become more important in people’s overall life. Kids in addition to their academics would have to get into school activities unless they wanted to feel completely out of it. But spontaneous activities among kids; the thing that came to my mind when I heard this was – sand lot football and sand lot baseball teams that we worked up as kids growing up. I said the kids wanting any activities outside of school would be almost forced to get them through the school. There would be few opportunities outside.
Now the pressures of the accelerated academic program, the accelerated demands where kids would feel they had to be part of something – one or another athletic club or some school activity – these pressures he recognized would cause some students to burn out. He said. “The smartest ones will learn how to cope with pressures and to survive. There will be some help available to students in handling stress, but the unfit won’t be able to make it. They will then move on to other things.”
In this connection and later on with drug abuse and alcohol abuse he indicated that psychiatric services to help would be increased dramatically. In all the pushing for achievement, it was recognized that many people would need help, and the people worth keeping around would be able to accept and benefit from that help, and still be super achievers. Those who could not would fall by the wayside and therefore were sort of dispensable ­ ‘expendable’ I guess is the word I want.
Education would be lifelong and adults would be going to school. There’ll always be new information that adults must have to keep up. When you can’t keep up anymore, you’re too old. This was another way of letting older people know that the time had come for them to move on and take the demise pill. If you got too tired to keep up with your education, or you got too old to learn new information, then this was a signal – you begin to prepare to get ready to step aside.
In addition to revising the classics, which I alluded to awhile ago and with revising the Bible, he said, “Some books would just disappear from the libraries.” This was in the vein that some books contain information or contain ideas that should not be kept around. Therefore, those books would disappear. I don’t remember exactly if he said how this was to be accomplished. But I seem to recall carrying away this idea that this would include thefts. That certain people would be designated to go to certain libraries and pick up certain books and just get rid of them. Not necessarily as a matter of policy – just simply steal it. Further down the line, not everybody will be allowed to own books. And some books nobody will be allowed to own.
Another area of discussion was laws that would be changed. At that time a lot of States had blue laws about Sunday sales, certain Sunday activities. He said the blue laws [Sunday laws] would all be repealed.
Gambling laws would be repeated or relaxed, so that gambling would be increased. He indicated then that governments would get into gambling. We’ve had a lot of state lotteries pop up around the country since then. And, at the time, we were already being told that would be the case. “Why should all that gambling money be kept in private hands when the State would benefit from it?” was the rational behind it. But people should be able to gamble if they want to. So it would become a civil activity, rather than a private, or illegal activity.
Bankruptcy laws would be changed. I don’t remember the details, but just that they would be. And I know subsequent to that time they have been. Antitrust laws would be changed, or be interpreted differently, or both. In connection with the changing anti-trust laws, there was some statement that in a sense competition would be increased. But this would be increased competition within otherwise controlled circumstances. So it’s not a free competition. I recall of having the impression that it was like competition but within members of a club. There would be nobody outside the club who would be able to compete. Like teams competing within a professional sports league; if you’re the NFL or the American or National Baseball Leagues – you compete within the league but the league is all in agreement on what the rules of competition are – not a really free competition.
Drug use would be increased. Alcohol use would be increased. Law enforcement efforts against drugs would be increased. On first hearing that it sounded like a contradiction. Why increase drug abuse and simultaneously increase law enforcement against drug abuse? But the idea is that, in part, the increased availability of drugs would provide a sort of law of the jungle whereby the weak and the unfit would be selected out.
There was a statement made at the time: “Before the earth was overpopulated, there was a law of the jungle where only the fittest survived. You had to be able to protect yourself against the elements and wild animals and disease, but if you were fit you survived. But now we’ve become so civilised – we’re over civilised – and the unfit are enabled to survive only at the expense of those who are more fit.” The abuse of drugs would restore, in a certain sense, the law of the jungle and selection of the fittest for survival.
News about drug abuse and law enforcement efforts would tend to keep drugs in the public consciousness. And would also tend to reduce this unwarranted American complacency that the world is a safe place, and a nice place.
The same thing would happen with alcohol. Alcohol abuse would be both promoted and demoted at the same time. The vulnerable and the weak would respond to the promotions and therefore use and abuse more alcohol.
Drunk driving would become more of a problem; and stricter rules about driving under the influence would be established so that more and more people would lose their privilege to drive. Again, much more in the way of psychological services would be made available to help those who got hooked on drugs and alcohol. The idea being, that in order to promote this – drug and alcohol are used to screen out some of the unfit – people who otherwise are pretty good would also be subject to getting hooked. And if they were really worth their salt they would have enough sense to seek psychological counselling and to benefit from it. So this was presented as sort of a redeeming value on the part of the planners. It was as if he was saying, “You think we’re bad in promoting these evil things – but look how nice we are – we’re also providing a way out!”
This also had connection with something we’ll get to later about overall restrictions on travel. Not everybody should be free to travel the way they do now in the United States. People don’t have a need to travel that way. It’s a privilege! It was kind of the high-handed the way it was put.
THE NEED FOR MORE JAILS, AND USING HOSPITALS AS JAILSMore jails would be needed. Hospitals could serve as jails. Some new hospital construction would be designed so as to make them adaptable to jail-like use.
End of Tape 1

Nothing is permanent. Streets would be re-routed and renamed. Areas you had not seen in a while would become unfamiliar. Among other things, this would contribute to older people feeling that it was time to move on, they feel they couldn’t even keep up with the changes in areas that were once familiar.
Buildings would be allowed to stand empty and deteriorate, and streets would be allowed to deteriorate in certain localities. The purpose of this was to provide the jungle, the depressed atmosphere for the unfit.
Somewhere in this same connection he mentioned that buildings and bridges would be made so that they would collapse after a while, there would be more accidents involving aeroplanes and railroads and automobiles. All of this to contribute to the feeling of insecurity, that nothing was safe. Not too long after this presentation, and I think one or two even before in the area where I live, we had a newly constructed bridge break. Another newly constructed bridge defect was discovered before it too broke. I remember reading just scattered incidents around the country where shopping malls would fall in right where they were filled with shoppers. I also remember that one of the shopping malls in our area, the first building I’d ever been in where you could feel this vibration throughout the entire building when there were a lot of people in there. I remember wondering at that time whether this shopping mall was one of the buildings he was talking about. Talking to construction people and architects about it they would say, “Oh no, that’s good when the building vibrates like that, that means it’s flexible not rigid.” Well, maybe so, we’ll wait and see. Other areas there would be well maintained. Not every part of the city would be slums.
There would be the created slums and other areas well maintained. Those people able to leave the slums for better areas then would learn to better appreciate the importance of human accomplishment. This meant that if they left the jungle and came to civilisation, so to speak, they could be proud of their own accomplishments that they made it. There was no related sympathy for those who were left behind in the jungle of drugs and deteriorating neighbourhoods.
Then a statement that was kind of surprising, “We think we can effectively limit crime to the slum areas, so it won’t be spread heavily into better areas”. I should maybe point out here that these are obviously not word for word quotations after 20 years, but where I say that I am quoting, I am giving the general drift of what was said close to word for word, perhaps not precisely so. I remember wondering, how can he be so confident that the criminal element is going to stay where he wants it to stay? But he went on to say that increased security would be needed in the better areas. That would mean more police, better co-ordinated police efforts. He did not say so, but I wondered at that time about the moves that were afoot to consolidate all the police departments of suburbs around the major cities. I think the John Birch Society was one that was saying “Support your local police, don’t let them be consolidated.” I remember wondering if that was one of the things he had in mind about security. It was not explicitly stated.
Anyhow he went on to say there would be a whole new industry of residential security systems to develop with alarms and locks and alarms going into the police department so that people could protect their wealth and their well being. Because some of the criminal activity would spill out of the slums into better, more affluent looking areas that looked like they would be worth burglarizing. And again it was stated like it was a redeeming quality: See we’re generating all this more crime but look how good we are – we’re also generating the means for you to protect yourself against the crime. A sort of repeated thing throughout this presentation was the recognised evil and then the self forgiveness thing, “See we’ve given you a way out.”
American industry came under discussion – it was the first that I’d heard the term global interdependence or that notion. The stated plan was that different parts of the world would be assigned different roles of industry and commerce in a unified global system.
The continued pre-eminence of the United States and the relative independence and self-sufficiency of the United States would have to be changed. This was one of the several times that he said in order to create a new structure, you first have to tear down the old, and American industry was one example of that. Our system would have to be curtailed in order to give other countries a chance to build their industries, because otherwise they would not be able to compete against the United States. This was especially true of our heavy industries that would be cut back while the same industries were being developed in other countries, notably Japan.
At this point there was some discussion of steel and particularly automobiles – I remember saying that automobiles would be imported from Japan on an equal footing with our own domestically produced automobiles, but the Japanese product would be better. Things would be made so they would break and fall apart, that is in the United States. so that people would tend to prefer the imported variety and this would give a bit of a boost to foreign competitors.
One example was the Japanese. In 1969 Japanese automobiles, if they were sold here at all I don’t remember, but they certainly weren’t very popular. But the idea was you could get a little bit disgusted with your Ford, GM or Chrysler product or whatever because little things like window handles would fall off more and plastic parts would break which had they been made of metal would hold up. Your patriotism about buying American would soon give way to practicality that if you bought Japanese, German or imported that it would last longer and you would be better off. Patriotism would go down the drain.
It was mentioned elsewhere things being made to fall apart too. I don’t remember specific items or if they were even stated other than automobiles, but I do recall of having the impression, sort of in my imagination, of a surgeon having something fall apart in his hands in the operating room at a critical time. Was he including this sort of thing in his discussion? But somewhere in this discussion about things being made deliberately defective and unreliable not only was to tear down patriotism but to be just a little source of irritation to people who would use such things. Again the idea that you not feel terribly secure, promoting the notion that the world isn’t a terribly reliable place.
The United States was to be kept strong in information, communications, high technology, education and agriculture. The United States was seen as continuing to be sort of the keystone of this global system. But heavy industry would be transported out.
One of the comments made about heavy industry was that we had had enough environmental damage from smoke stacks and industrial waste. Other people could put up with that for a while. This again was supposed to be a redeeming quality for Americans to accept. You took away our industry but you saved our environment. So we really didn’t lose on it.
And along this line there were talks about people losing their jobs as a result of industry and opportunities for retraining, and particularly population shifts would be brought about. This is sort of an aside. I think I’ll explore the aside before I forget it. Population shifts were to be brought about so that people would be tending to move into the Sun Belt. They would be the sort of people without roots in their new locations, and traditions are easier to change in a place where there are a lot of transplanted people, as compared to trying to change traditions in a place where people grew up and had an extended family, and had roots.
Things like new medical care systems, if you pick up from a Northeast industrial city and you transplant yourself to the South Sunbelt or Southwest, you’ll be more accepting of whatever kind of, for example, controlled medical care you find there than you would accept a change in the medical care system where you had roots and the support of your family.
Also in this vein was mentioned (he used the plural personal pronoun we) we take control first of the port cities – New York, San Francisco, Seattle – the idea being that this is a piece of strategy, the idea being that if you control the port cities with your philosophy and your way of life, the heartland in between has to yield. I can’t elaborate more on that but it is interesting. The heartland, the Midwest, does seem to have maintained its conservatism. But as you take away industry and jobs and relocate people then this is a strategy to break down conservatism. When you take away industry and people are unemployed and poor they will accept whatever change seems, to offer them survival, and their morals and their commitment to things will all give way to survival. That’s not my philosophy, that’s the speaker’s philosophy.
Anyhow, going back to industry, some heavy industry would remain, just enough to maintain a sort of a seed bed of industrial skills which could be expanded if the plan didn’t work out as it was intended. So the country would not be devoid of assets and skills. But this was just sort of a contingency plan. It was hoped and expected that the world-wide specialisation would be carried on.
But, perhaps repeating myself, one of the upshots of all of this is that with this ‘global interdependence’ the national identities would tend to be de-emphasised. Each area depended on every other area for one or another elements of its life. We would all become citizens of the world rather than citizens of any one country.
And along these lines then we can talk about sports. Sports in the United States was to be changed, in part as a way of de-emphasising nationalism. Soccer, a world-wide sport, was to be emphasised and pushed in the United States. This was of interest because in this area the game of soccer was virtually unknown at that time. I had a few friends who attended an elementary school other than the one I attended where they played soccer and they were a real novelty. This was back in the 50′s. So to hear this man speak of soccer in this area was kind of surprising. Anyhow, soccer is seen as an international sport and would be promoted and the traditional sport of American baseball would be de-emphasised and possibly eliminated because it might be seen as too American. And he discussed eliminating this. One’s first reaction would be – well, they pay the players poorly and they don’t want to play for poor pay so they give up baseball and go into some other sport or some other activity. But he said that’s really not how it works. Actually, the way to break down baseball would be to make the salaries go very high. The idea behind this was that as the salaries got ridiculously high there would be a certain amount of discontent and antagonism as people resented the athletes being paid so much, and the athletes would begin more and more to resent among themselves what other players were paid and would tend to abandon the sport. And these high salaries also could break the owners and alienate the fans. And then the fans would support soccer and the baseball fields could be used as soccer fields. It wasn’t said definitely this would have to happen, but if the international flavour didn’t come around rapidly enough this could be done.
There was some comment along the same lines about football, although I seem to recall he said football would be harder to dismantle because it was so widely played in colleges as well as in the professional leagues and would be harder to tear down. There was something else also about the violence in football that met a psychological need that was perceived, and people have a need for this vicarious violence. So football, for that reason, might be left around to meet that need. The same thing is true of hockey. Hockey had more of an international flavour and would be emphasised. There was some foreseeable international competition about hockey and particularly soccer. At that time hockey was international between the United States and Canada. I was kind of surprised because I thought the speaker just never impressed me as being a hockey fan, and I am. And it turns out he was not. He just knew about the game and what it would do to this changing sports program. But in any event soccer was to be the keystone of athletics because it is already a world wide sport in South America, Europe, and parts of Asia and the United States should get on the bandwagon. All this would foster international competition so that we would all become citizens of the world to a greater extent than citizens of our own narrow nations.
There was some discussion about hunting, not surprisingly. Hunting requires guns and gun control is a big element in these plans. I don’t remember the details much, but the idea is that gun ownership is a privilege and not everybody should have guns. Hunting was an inadequate excuse for owning guns and everybody should be restricted in gun ownership. The few privileged people who should be allowed to hunt could maybe rent or borrow a gun from official quarters rather than own their own. After all, everybody doesn’t have a need for a gun, is the way it was put. Very important in sports was sports for girls. Athletics would be pushed for girls. This was intended to replace dolls. Baby dolls would still be around, a few of them, but you would not see the number and variety of dolls. Dolls would not be pushed because girls should not be thinking about babies and reproduction. Girls should be out on the athletic field just as the boys are. Girls and boys really don’t need to be all that different. Tea sets were to go the way of dolls, and all these things that traditionally were thought of as feminine would be de-emphasised as girls got into more masculine pursuits. Just one other thing I recall was that the sports pages would be full of the scores of girls teams just right along- there with the boys teams. And that’s recently begun to appear after 20 years in our local papers. The girls sports scores are right along with the boys sports scores. So all of this is to change the role model of what young girls should look to be. While she’s growing up she should look to be an athlete rather than to look forward to being a mother.
Entertainment. Movies would gradually be made more explicit as regards sex and language. After all, sex and rough language are real and why pretend that they are not? There would be pornographic movies in the theatres and on television. VCR’s were not around at that time, but he had indicated that these cassettes would be available, and video cassette players would be available for use in the home and pornographic movies would be available for use on these as well as in the neighbourhood theatre and on your television. He said something like: “you’ll see people in the movies doing everything you can think of.” He went on to say that all of this is intended to bring sex out in the open. That was another comment that was made several times- the term “sex out in the open.”
Violence would be made more graphic. This was intended to desensitise people to violence. There might need to be a time when people would witness real violence and be a part of it. Later on it will become clear where this is headed. So there would be more realistic violence in entertainment which would make it easier for people to adjust. People’s attitudes toward death would change. People would not be so fearful of it but more accepting of it, and they would not be so aghast at the sight of dead people or injured people. We don’t need to have a genteel population paralysed by what they might see. People would just learn to say, well I don’t want that to happen to me. This was the first statement suggesting that the plan includes numerous human casualties which the survivors would see.
This particular aspect of the presentation came back in my memory very sharply a few years later when a movie about the Lone Ranger came out and I took my very young son to see it and early in the movie were some very violent scenes. One of the victims was shot in the forehead and there was sort of a splat where the bullet entered his forehead and blood and I remember regretting that I took my son and feeling anger toward the doctor who spoke. Not that he made the movie, but he agreed to be part of this movement, and I was repelled by the movie and it brought back this aspect of his presentation very sharply in my memory.
As regards music, he made a rather straightforward statement like: Music will get worse. In 1969 Rock music was getting more and more unpleasant. It was interesting the way he expressed it, “it would get worse” acknowledging that it was already bad. Lyrics would become more openly sexual. No new sugary romantic music would be publicised like that which had been written before that time. All of the old music would be brought back on certain radio stations and records for older people to hear, and older folks would have sort of their own radio stations to hear and for younger people, their music as it got worse and worse would be on their stations. He seemed to indicate that one group would not hear the other group’s music. Older folks would just refuse to hear the junk that was offered to young people, and the young people would accept the junk because it identified them as their generation and helped them feel distinct from the older generation. I remember at the time thinking that would not last very long because even young kids wouldn’t like the junk when they got a chance to hear the older music that was prettier they would gravitate toward it. Unfortunately I was wrong about that, when the kids get through their teens and into their 20′s some of them improve their taste in music, but unfortunately he was right. They get used to this junk and that’s all they want. A lot of them can’t stand really pretty music. He went on to say that the music would carry a message to the young and nobody would even know the message was there they would just think it was loud music. At the time I didn’t understand quite what he meant by that, but in retrospect I think we know now what the messages are in the music for the young.
And again he was right. This aspect was sort of summarised with the notion that entertainment would be a tool to influence young people. It won’t change the older people, they are already set in their ways, but the changes would all be aimed at the young who are in their formative years and the older generation would be passing. Not only could you not change them but they are relatively unimportant anyhow. Once they live out their lives and are gone the younger generation being formed are the ones that would be important for the future in the 21st century. He also indicated all the old movies would be brought back again and I remember on hearing that through my mind ran quickly the memory of a number of old movies. I wondered if they would be included, the ones that I thought I would like to see again. Along with bringing back old music and movies for older people there were other privileges that would also be accorded older folks: free transportation, breaks on purchases, discounts, tax discounts, – a number of privileges just because they were older. This was stated to be sort of a reward for the generation which had grown up through the depression and had survived the rigors of World War II. They had deserved it and they were going to be rewarded with all these goodies, and the bringing back of the good old music and the good old movies was going to help ease them through their final years in comfort. Then the presentation began to get rather grim, because once that generation passed, and that would be in the late 80′s and early 90′s where we are now, most of that group would be gone and then gradually things would tighten up and the tightening up would be accelerated. The old movies and old songs would be withdrawn, the gentler entertainment would be withdrawn.
Travel, instead of being easy for old folks, travel then would become very restricted. People would need permission to travel and they would need a good reason to travel. If you didn’t have a good reason for your travel you would not be allowed to travel, and everyone would need ID. This would at first be an ID card you would carry on your person and you must show when you are asked for it. It was already planned that later on some sort of device would be developed to be implanted under the skin that would be coded specifically to identify the individual. This would eliminate the possibility of false ID and also eliminate the possibility of people saying “Well, I lost my ID.” The difficulty about these skin implant that ID was stated to be getting material that would stay in or under the skin without causing foreign body reaction whereby the body would reject it or cause infection, and that this would have to be material on which information could be recorded and retrieved by some sort of scanner while it was not rejected by the body.
Silicon was mentioned. Silicon at that time was thought to be well tolerated. It was used to augment breasts. Women who felt their breasts were too small would get silicon implants, and I guess that still goes on. At any rate silicon was seen at that time as the promising material to do both: to be retained in the body without rejection and to be able to retain information retrievable by electronic means.
Food supplies would come under tight control. If population growth didn’t slow down, food shortages could be created in a hurry and people would realise the dangers of overpopulation. Ultimately, whether the population slows down or not the food supply is to be brought under centralised control so that people would have enough to be well-nourished but they would not have enough to support any fugitive from the new system. In other words, if you had a friend or relative who didn’t sign on, and growing ones own food would be outlawed. This would be done under some sort of pretext. In the beginning I mentioned there were two purposes for everything – one the ostensible purpose and one the real purpose, and the ostensible purpose here would be that growing your own vegetables was unsafe, it would spread disease or something like that. So the acceptable idea was to protect the consumer but the real idea was to limit the food supply and growing your own food would be illegal. And if you persist in illegal activities like growing your own food, then you’re a criminal.
There was a mention then of weather. This was another really striking statement. He said, “We can or soon will be able to control the weather.” He said, “I’m not merely referring to dropping iodide crystals into the clouds to precipitate rain that’s already there, but REAL control.” And weather was seen as a weapon of war, a weapon of influencing public policy. It could make rain or withhold rain in order to influence certain areas and bring them under your control. There were two sides to this that were rather striking. He said, “On the one hand you can make drought during the growing season so that nothing will grow, and on the other hand you can make for very heavy rains during harvest season so the fields are too muddy to bring in the harvest, and indeed one might be able to do both.” There was no statement how this would be done. It was stated that either it was already possible or very, very close to being possible.
Politics. He said that very few people really know how government works. Something to the effect that elected officials are influenced in ways that they don’t even realise and they carry out plans that have been made for them and they think that they are authors of the plans. But actually they are manipulated in ways they don’t understand.
Somewhere in the presentation he made two statements that I want to insert at this time. I don’t remember just where they were made, but they’re valid in terms of the general overall view. One statement is, “People can carry in their minds and act upon two contradictory ideas at one time, provided that these two contradictory ideas are kept far enough apart.”
The other statement is, “You can know pretty well how rational people are going to respond to certain circumstances or to certain information that they encounter. So, to determine the response you want you need only control the kind of data or information that they’re presented or the kinds of circumstance that they’re in; and being rational people they’ll do what you want them to do. They may not fully understand what they’re doing or why.”
Somewhere in this connection, then, was the statement admitting that some scientific research data could be, and indeed has been, falsified in order to bring about desired results. Here he said, “People don’t ask the right questions. Some people are too trusting.” Now this was an interesting statement because the speaker and the audience all being doctors of medicine and supposedly very objective, dispassionately scientific and science being the be all and end-all. To falsify scientific research data in that setting is like blasphemy in the church, you just don’t do that. Anyhow, out of all of this was to come the New International Governing Body, probably to come through the U.N. and with a World Court, but not necessarily through those structures. It could be brought about in other ways. Acceptance of the U.N . at that time was seen as not being as wide as was hoped. Efforts would continue to give the United Nations increasing importance. People would be more and more used to the idea of relinquishing some national sovereignty. Economic interdependence would foster this goal from a peaceful standpoint. Avoidance of war would foster it from the standpoint of worrying about hostilities. It was recognised that doing it peaceably was better than doing it by war. It was stated at this point that war was “obsolete.”
I thought that was an interesting phrase because obsolete means something that once was seen as useful is no longer useful. But war is obsolete, because of nuclear bombs, war is no longer controllable. Formerly wars could be controlled, but if nuclear weapons would fall into the wrong hands there could be an unintended nuclear disaster. It was not stated who the “wrong hands” are. We were free to infer that maybe this meant terrorists, but in more recent years I’m wondering whether the wrong hands might also include people that we’ve assumed they’ve had nuclear weapons all along, maybe they don’t have them. Just as it was stated that industry would be preserved in the United States – a little bit just in case the world wide plans didn’t work out; just in case some country or some other powerful person decided to bolt from the pack and go his own way, one wonders whether this might also be true with nuclear weapons. When he said they might fall into the wrong hands, there was some statement that the possession of nuclear weapons had been tightly controlled, sort of implying that anybody who had nuclear weapons was intended to have them. That would necessarily have included the Soviet Union, if indeed they have them. But I recall wondering at the time, “Are you telling us, or are you implying that this country willingly gave weapons to the Soviets?.”
At that time that seemed like a terribly unthinkable thing to do, much less to admit. The leaders of the Soviet Union seem to be so dependent on the West though, one wonders whether there may have been some fear that they would try to assert independence if they indeed had these weapons. So, I don’t know. It’s something to speculate about perhaps. Who did he mean when he said, “If these weapons fall into the wrong hands”? Maybe just terrorists. Anyhow, the new system would be brought in, if not by peaceful co-operation with everybody willingly yielding national sovereignty and then by bringing the nation to the brink of nuclear war. Everybody would be so fearful as hysteria is created by the possibility of nuclear war that there would be a strong public outcry to negotiate a public peace and people would willingly give up national sovereignty in order to achieve peace, and thereby this would bring in the ‘New International Political System.’ This was stated and a very impressive thing to hear then, “If there were too many people in the right places who resisted this, there might be a need to use one or two or possibly more nuclear weapons.” As it was put this would be possibly needed to convince people that, “We mean business.” That was followed by the statement that, “By the time one or two of those went off then everybody, even the most reluctant, would yield.” He said something about, “This negotiated peace would be very convincing”, as in a framework or in a context that the whole thing was rehearsed but nobody would know it.
People hearing about it would be convinced that it was a genuine negotiation between hostile enemies who finally had come to the realisation that peace was better than war. In this context discussing war, and war is obsolete, a statement was made that there were some good things about war. One was you’re going to die anyway and people sometimes in war get a chance to display great courage and heroism. If they die they’ve died well and if they survive they get recognition. So that in any case, the hardships of war on soldiers are worth it because that’s the reward they get out of their warring. Another justification expressed for war was, if you think of the many millions of casualties in WWI and WWII had not died but had continued to live and continued to have babies then there would be millions upon millions and we would already be overpopulated. So those two great wars served a benign purpose in delaying over-population. But now there are technological means for the individual and governments to control over-population so in this regard war is obsolete. It’s no longer needed. And then again it’s obsolete because nuclear weapons could destroy the whole universe. War, which once was controllable, could get out of control and so for these two reasons it’s now obsolete.
There was a discussion of terrorism. Terrorism would be used widely in Europe and in other parts of the world. Terrorism at that time was thought would not be necessary in the United States. It could become necessary in the United States if the United States did not move rapidly enough into accepting the system. But at least in the foreseeable future it was not planned. And very benignly on their part. Maybe terrorism would not be required here, but the implication being that it would be indeed used if it was necessary. Along with this came a bit of a scolding that Americans had had it too good anyway and just a little bit of terrorism would help convince Americans that the world is indeed a dangerous place, or can be if we don’t relinquish control to the proper authorities.
There was discussion of money and banking. One statement was, “Inflation is infinite. You can put an infinite number of zeros after any number and put the decimals points wherever you want”, as an indication that inflation is a tool of the controllers. Money would become predominately credit. It was already. Money is primarily a credit thing but exchange of money would be not cash or palpable things but electronic credit signal. People would carry money only in very small amounts for things like chewing gum and candy bars. Any purchase of any significant amount would be done electronically. Earnings would be electronically entered into your account. It would be a single banking system. It may have the appearance of being more than one but ultimately and basically it would be one single banking system, so that when you got paid your pay would be entered for you into your account balance and then when you purchased anything at the point of purchase it would be deducted from your account balance and you would actually carry nothing with you. Also computer records can be kept on whatever it was you purchased so that if you were purchasing too much of any particular item and some official wanted to know what you were doing with your money they could go back and review your purchases and determine what you were buying.
There was a statement that any purchase of significant size like an automobile, bicycle, a refrigerator, a radio or television or whatever might have some sort of identification on it so it could be traced, so that very quickly anything which was either given away or stolen – whatever – authorities would be able to establish who purchased it and when. Computers would allow this to happen. The ability to save would be greatly curtailed. People would just not be able to save any considerable degree of wealth. There was some statement of recognition that wealth represents power and wealth in the hands of a lot of people is not good for the people in charge so if you save too much you might be taxed. The more you save the higher rate of tax on your savings so your savings really could never get very far. And also if you began to show a pattern of saving too much you might have your pay cut. We would say, “Well, your saving instead of spending. You really don’t need all that money.”
That basically the idea being to prevent people from accumulating any wealth which might have long range disruptive influence on the system. People would be encouraged to use credit to borrow and then also be encouraged to renege on their debt so they would destroy their own credit. The idea here is that, again, if you’re too stupid to handle credit wisely, this gives the authorities the opportunity to come down hard on you once you’ve shot your credit. Electronic payments initially would all be based on different kinds of credit cards which were already in use in 1969 to some extent. Not as much as now, but people would have credit cards with the electronic strip on it and once they got used to that then it would be pointed out the advantage of having all of that combined into a single credit card, serving a single monetary system and then they won’t have to carry around all that plastic.
So, the next step would be the single card and then the next step would be to replace the single card with a skin implant. The single card could be lost or stolen, give rise to problems; could be exchanged with somebody else to confuse identify. The skin implant on the other hand could not be not lost or counterfeited or transferable to another person so you and your accounts would be identified without any possibility of error. And the skin implants would have to be put some place that would be convenient to the skin; for example your right hand or your forehead. At that time when I heard this I was unfamiliar with the statements in the Book of Revelation. The speaker went on to say, “Now some of you people who read the Bible will attach significance to this to the Bible,” but he went on to disclaim any Biblical significance at all. This is just common sense of how the system could work and should work and there’s no need to read any superstitious Biblical principals into it. As I say, at the time I was not very familiar with the words of Revelations.
Shortly after I became familiar with it and the significance of what he said really was striking. I’ll never forget it. There was some mention, also, of implants that would lend themselves to surveillance by providing radio signals. This could be under the skin or a dental implant, put in like a filling so that either fugitives or possibly other citizens could be identified by a certain frequency from his personal transmitter and could be located at any time or any place by any authority who wanted to find him. This would be particularly useful for somebody who broke out of prison. There was more discussion of personal surveillance. One more thing was said, “You’ll be watching television and somebody will be watching you at the same time at a central monitoring station.” Television sets would have a device to enable this. The T.V. set would not have to be on in order for this to be operative. Also, the television set can be used to monitor what you are watching. People can tell what you’re watching on TV and how you’re reacting to what you’re watching. And you would not know that you were being watched while you were watching your television. How would we get people to accept these things into their homes? Well, people would buy them when they buy their own television. They won’t know that they’re on there at first.
This was described by being what we now know as Cable TV to replace the antenna TV. When you buy a TV set this monitor would just be part of the set and most people would not have enough knowledge to know it was there in the beginning. And then the cable would be the means of carrying the surveillance message to the monitor. By the time people found out that this monitoring was going on, they would also be very dependent upon television for a number of things. Just the way people are dependent upon the telephone today. One thing the television would be used for would be purchases. You wouldn’t have to leave your home to purchase. You just turn on your TV and there would be a way of interacting with your television channel to the store that you wanted to purchase. And you could flip the switch from place to place to choose a refrigerator or clothing. This would be both convenient, but it would also make you dependent on your television so the built-in monitor would be something you could not do without.
There was some discussion of audio monitors too, just in case the authorities wanted to hear what was going on in rooms other than where the television monitor was. In regard to this the statement was made, “Any wire that went into your house, for example your telephone wire, could be used this way”. I remember this in particular because it was fairly near the end of the presentation and as we were leaving the meeting place I said something to one of my colleagues about going home and pulling all of the wires out of my house, except I knew I couldn’t get by without the telephone. And the colleague I spoke to just seemed numb. To this day I don’t think he even remembers what we talked about or what we hear that time, cause I’ve asked him. But at that time he seemed stunned. Before all these changes would take place with electronic monitoring, it was mentioned that there would be service trucks all over the place, working on the wires and putting in new cables. This is how people who were on the inside would know how things were progressing.
Privately owned housing would become a thing of the past. The cost of housing and financing housing would gradually be made so high that most people couldn’t afford it. People who already owned their houses would be allowed to keep them but as years go by it would be more and more difficult for young people to buy a house. Young people would more and more become renters, particularly in apartments or condominiums. More and more unsold houses would stand vacant. People just couldn’t buy them. But the cost of housing would not come down. You’d right away think, well the vacant house, the price would come down, the people would buy it. But there was some statement to the effect that the price would be held high even though there were many available so that free market places would not operate. People would not be able to buy these and gradually more and more of the population would be forced into small apartments. Small apartments which would not accommodate very many children. Then as the number of real home-owners diminished they would become a minority. There would be no sympathy for them from the majority who dwelled in the apartments and then these homes could be taken by increased taxes or other regulations that would be detrimental to home ownership and would be acceptable to the majority.
Ultimately, people would be assigned where they would live and it would be common to have non-family members living with you. This by way of your not knowing just how far you could trust anybody. This would all be under the control of a central housing authority. Have this in mind in 1990 when they ask, “How many bedrooms in your house? How many bathrooms in your house? Do you have a finished game room? “This information is personal and is of no national interest to government under our existing Constitution. But you’ll be asked those questions and decide how you want to respond to them.
When the new system takes over people will be expected to sign allegiance to it, indicating that they don’t have any reservations or holding back to the old system. “There just won’t be any room”, he said, “for people who won’t go along. We can’t have such people cluttering up the place so such people would be taken to special places”, and here I don’t remember the exact words, but the inference I drew was that at these special places where they were taken, then they would not live very long. He may have said something like, “disposed of humanely”, but I don’t remember very precisely, just the impression the system was not going to support them when they would not go along with the system. That would leave death as the only alternative.
Somewhere in this vein he said there would not be any martyrs. When I first heard this I thought it meant the people would not be killed, but as the presentation developed what he meant was they would not be killed in such a way or disposed of in such a way that they could serve as inspiration to other people the way martyrs do. Rather he said something like this. “People will just disappear.” Just a few additional items sort of thrown in here in the end which I failed to include where they belong more perfectly. The bringing in of the new system he said probably would occur on a weekend in the winter. Everything would shut down on Friday evening and Monday morning when everybody wakened there would be an announcement that the New System was in place.
During the process in getting the United States ready for these changes everybody would be busier with less leisure time and less opportunity to really look about and see what was going on around them. Also, there would be more changes and more difficulty in keeping up as far as one’s investments. Investment instruments would be changing. Interest rates would be changing so that it would be a difficult job with keeping up with what you had already earned. Interesting about automobiles; it would look as though there were many varieties of automobiles, but when you look very closely there would be great duplication. They would be made to look different with chrome and wheel covers and this sort of thing, but looking closely one would see that the same automobile was made by more than one manufacturer.
This recently was brought down to me when I was in a parking lot and saw a small Ford – I forget the model – and a small Japanese automobile which were identical except for a number of things like the number of holes in the wheel cover and the chrome around the plate and the shape of the grill. But if you looked at the basic parts of the automobile, they were identical. They just happened to be parked side-by-side where I was struck with this and I was again reminded of what had been said many years ago. I’m hurrying here because I’m just about to the end of the tape. Let me just summarise here by saying, all of these things said by one individual at one time in one place relating to so many different human endeavours and then to look and see how many of these actually came about. Meaning the changes accomplished between then and now [1969 – 1988] and the things which are planned for the future. I think there is no denying that this is controlled and there is indeed a conspiracy.
The question then becomes what to do. I think first off, we must put our faith in God and pray and ask for his guidance. And secondly do what we can to inform other individuals as much as possible, as much as they may be interested. Some people just don’t care, because they’re preoccupied with getting along in their own personal endeavours. But as much as possible I think we should try to inform other people who may be interested, and again put our faith and trust in God and pray constantly for his guidance and for the courage to accept what we may be facing in the near future. Rather than accept peace and justice which we hear so much now. It’s a cliché! Let’s insist on liberty and justice for all.

Source: Rense New World System.

Comments Off on Theory? or Fact? Posted in Posts

An Easter Gift…

A Gift for Easter!

The other day I posted an article for/about wisdom/foolishness for “April Fool’s Day”. (Funny that this day falls around Easter this year huh? Hmmm!) Anyway…

I posted an article by a friend of mine, Peter, and I hope it was a blessing. – There is an up-date to that item by the way, a reply to a response from another friend, Rafael, and you can find it if you scroll down on the page here:

In the intro I mentioned three books by Solomon, and that “the bottom-line”, of everything, is Love. Well, yet another friend of mine also recently posted an article on this very subject, so, again, I would like to share that here. I feel very much like dear Chris, in that I fall WAY “short of the mark” myself also, and way too often, sad to say in my case. However, Love is all about The One Who NEVER fails, even when WE do.

The following is often referred to as “The Love Chapter”. In other words, it is a very descriptive account of what Love is supposed to be like, how it is actually meant to be applied. None of us are able to live up to this all the time, for sure, but it does make a good “measuring stick” anyway, so…..

Here are Chris’ comments as he shares them. – Why is this “an Easter Gift”? – Because Love Himself made it all possible, as Chris explains at the end. Read on…..

Mar 31, 2015 12:00 am
My Life Under 1 Corinthians 13 Inspection
By Chris Mizrany

I was reading 1 Corinthians 13 today, and meditating on the practical application of the verses. I’d never truly thought about it until now. I wrote down my thoughts, and hope they will be an inspiration to you too. (For clarity, I used the word “love” instead of “charity” in the verses from the King James Version.)

“Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not love, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.”

Well, recently I’ve been trying, again, to learn another language. I’ve made it my goal to practice a little several days a week. As a result, I am getting better. But still, there is a long, long way to go before I’ll feel fully comfortable and be fluent. Now, I would like to tell myself that if I could speak with all the tongues of men and of angels, I’d be doing pretty well. I might even pat myself on the back two or three times, ha. Realizing this made the verse have so much more meaning to me—showing how truly important love is above all accomplishments.

“And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not love, I am nothing.”

I cherish the gift of prophecy. I am so thrilled to be able to hear directly from Jesus when I need guidance. I also really enjoy that feeling when God does a miracle and my faith grows, so that the next time I’m more confident that He’s going to handle it. I can see, though, that intrinsically tied in with these gifts is the great love that makes it all work.

“And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not love, it profiteth me nothing.”

I’m part of Helping Hand—a busy missionary and humanitarian project in Cape Town, South Africa. We distribute a lot of goods to the poor, and sometimes during those early mornings or late nights, I do get a little “burned out.” This verse reminded me that it’s only love that is our motivation—the unending “love of Christ that constrains us” to “comfort others with the same comfort we received from God.”1 That’s what keeps us going.

“Love suffereth long, and is kind; love envieth not; love vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up,

Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil;

Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth;

Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.”

Well, that pretty much speaks for itself. I’m no model example of suffering long and being kind, or behaving right always, or being unselfish, or not getting provoked, or always focusing on the truth, or enduring all things. Sometimes I’m … well, quite the opposite.

Here is something powerful to remember, though: Love even works to cleanse what isn’t loving. “While we were yet sinners, Jesus Christ died for us.”2 “Love covers a multitude of sins.”3 So while I do want to continue striving to have that love that these verses mention, I know that even when I don’t, Jesus does. He is my Savior. He is love, and the best example of love the world has ever seen. And if I stay close to Him, His love will rub off on me more and more.4

“Love never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.

But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.”

How true it is that love is the easiest thing to understand. As many have said before, even a baby understands love. Love is really our foundation and our priority, because all those other things base off of and grow from love—both for God and for others. Without love, it’s all works. I am working on gaining that perspective rather than focusing overly on accomplishments.

“When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.

For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.”

When I arrive in heaven, I know I will be awed at the results of the little loving deeds I’ve done here. I’m sure I’ll wish I’d done more, but the wonder of seeing how love begat love, even spreading far beyond my region, work, and life, is a thrill I’m looking forward to!

“And now abideth faith, hope, love, these three; but the greatest of these is love.”

How many songs, books, poems, and letters have been written about love? Many, many, many! And yet, there is a single act that forever defines love. Unsurpassed, it still is the standard by which all loving acts can be judged and the model on which every loving life can be built. It was the voluntary, humble, forgiving, and eternal love of God in Jesus when He died a terrible, difficult, unfair, and mortal death on the cross of Calvary, so that we would never have to face a loveless end. We have been made heirs to heaven, by faith, and that is where our hope lies—in His unfailing love.

1 2 Corinthians 1:4, 5:14.
2 Romans 5:8.
3 1 Peter 4:8.
4 John 15:5.

Comments Off on An Easter Gift… Posted in Posts